Thursday, November 14, 2013

On January 9th, 1892, Clementina Black wrote an essay regarding Thomas Hardy's infamous Tess of the D'Urbervilles which was published in The Illustrated London News. Black argued that Hardy's novel is morally earnest and accurately articulates the injustice that women during the time faced. Black writes "Mr Hardy's story, like Diana of the Crossways, is founded on recognition of the ironic truth which we all know in our hearts, and are all forbidden to say aloud, that the richest kind of womanly nature, the most direct, sincere, and passionate, is the most liable to be caught in that sort of pitfall which social convention stamps as an irretrievable disgrace" (Black 383). Just a month after Black's essay was published, William Watson published an essay regarding the character of Angle, in The Academy. Watson argued that rather than Alec being the main antagonist in the narrative that Angel is the villain to do his inconsistencies regarding emotion and human nature. Watson writes "Her seducer, the spurious D'Urberville, is entirely detestable, but it often happens that one's fiercest indignation demands a nobler object than such a sorry animal as that; and there are probably many readers who, after Tess's marriage with Clare, her spontaneous disclosure to him of her soiled though guiltless past, and his consequent alienation and cruelty, will be conscious of a worse anger against this intellectual, virtuous, and unfortunate man than they could spare for the heartless and worthless liberating who had wrecked these two lives" (Watson 386).

I agree with Black's idea that Tess is an accurate portrayal of the isolation and alienation that sexually active or abused women faced during the Victorian Age and many years that followed. Through articulating such Hardy does indeed represent feminism and the wrongness that is wrought upon them. Watson also had a very interesting point concerning Angel. From the very beginning of the novel, the reader dislikes Alec and throughout is seen as creepy and menacing, when Angel's cruelty arises the reader is shocked and disappointed. There is so much hope for Tess when she falls in love with Angel, however his emotional inconsistencies and cruel nature make him more of a villain than Alec who albeit commits heinous actions is sincere and honest.

3 comments:

  1. I see Alec and Angel almost on an even playing field. I don't truly hate either, but do not exactly like either. Alec seems to be the character that embodies the physical evil in a villain, while Angel embodies the emotional evils. Neither is more important of wrong than the other, and together they cause complete terror for Tess.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Part of me does want to see Alec as the bad guy and have Angel being the good but both of the men are bad and good. Alec is bad because of the pain that he inflicts on women and the novel says that Tess is not the only girl he had ever done this too. Angel just irritates me because he upheld a double standard.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I constantly go back and forth with who I think the main villain of the novel is. However, right now my mind is set on Alec being the main villain instead of Angel. This is because it seems as though Alec's act of rape in the beginning of the novel put in motion the rest of the events that happen to Tess. If he wouldn't have done that then Angel wouldn't have freaked out on Tess and Tess wouldn't feel so badly about herself as she does throughout the novel. Alec in my eyes started a chain of bad events making him the main villain.

    ReplyDelete